杰出的细胞遗传学家 巴巴拉·麦克林托克

The Distinguished Cytogeneticist Barbara McClintock
资料来自:http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%B7%B4%E5%B7%B4%E6%8B%89%C2%B7%E9%BA%A6%E5%85%8B%E6%9E%97%E6%89%98%E5%85%8B&variant=zh-hk 
Barbara McClintock
Barbara McClintock
Barbara McClintock
Born June 16, 1902
Hartford, Connecticut
Died September 2, 1992 (aged 90)
Huntington, New York
Field genetics
Notable prizes Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1983)

Barbara McClintock是一個對遺傳學有重大進貢獻的一名女性科學家。她對遺傳學的貢獻到現在我們也受惠得到。Barbara McClintock她出生在美國的Hartford, Connecticut,自小就非常聰明。在1921年她還是一個大學生,她修了當時Cornell學校唯一由C. B. Hutchison任教的遺傳課,那遺傳課使他對遺傳有著很大的興趣,但當時大多人都不想跑遺傳這一門,並且大家都覺得女性更不應該接觸,但她卻不理會,她很想投入遺傳的懷抱。她也上了Lester W. Sharp開的課,從而了解到染色體的結構、分絲分裂、減數分裂、crossing-over等等,便知道了染色體是可遺傳的主要源素。因此她畢業後更想去把牽涉染色體等的表現作進一步的研究,而且她覺得此研究是非常具有潛力的。同時在1922年她接到C. B. Hutchison的電話,Barbara參加了graduate genetics course,開始她的遺傳研究生涯。但當她碩、博士畢業的時候,Cornell大學卻因為她是女性,不予給他遺傳學的,只給他植物學的學位。

McClintock畢業後仍留在Cornell當植物學的instructor,她集合好幾個研究員進一步研究有關玉米的cytogenetic。在研究期間她發明了用carmine去染玉米的染色體,使她成為第一個人能染出玉米有10條染色體。1929她在genetic paper發表了玉米有三倍體的染色體的文章,令當時的科學家開始對玉米的研究有興趣。接著在1930年她又第一個更提出在減數分裂時染色體有crossing-over的發生的假設,由此她更觀察出染色體透過recombination遺傳形成新的特徵。在1931她發表了玉米的genetic map。在朋友及其他學術同伴的支持下,他終於得到National Research Council.的研究經費使她更致力研究。

之後她在Missouri學到使用X-rays使基因突變,透過此技術,她第一個發現了環狀的染色體,更知道此是因為染色體不穩定做成。而她利用X-rays去研究染色體的breakage fusion bridge的cycle。在1938年證明了telomere 和centromere的角色是用來保存著染色體的遺傳訊息。

她在Missouri時因為她是女性,薪資只有$3000,比一般同級的少,極為不公平。所以到了1941年她終於受到了邀請去了一個很好的實驗室--Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,在這她有更好的資源及支援給她繼續研究。在1944年McClintock在遺傳上有傑出的成就得到承認,McClintock 當上了 National Academy of Sciences的院士,而她是當時史上第三位女性得到這榮譽。事隔一年在1945年她更當選為Genetics Society of America的第一位女主席。 接著她繼續在Cold Spring Harbor研究為什麼玉米的種子會有著不同的顏色,而且這顏色的遺傳是不一定的。經過一番研究,她找到了兩個新的loci,她將它命為名為Dissociator (Ds) and Activator (Ac)。她找到Dissociator是不能單獨的使染色體打斷,一定要透過Activator ,才能使鄰近的基因改變。這突破性的發現使所有科學家大驚。因為當時分生並不發達,她只能用雜交的方法,再透過用顯微鏡的觀察,她觀察到當Ds 移動的時候aleurone-color gene 就會不受抑制的釋放了出來,進而得到活化,使合成色素,但前題是Ac 要先控制Ds的進行,更神奇的是Ds的transposition是隨意的,不同的玉米種子有不同development所以顏色就會有所不同。綜合了她的研究她提出了一個理論,就是Dissociator and Activator 這種 mobile elements 會去調節gene的抑制以及控制它的活性。她更稱Dissociator和Activator a是"controlling units",她大膽的假設這種基因的調控解釋了為什麼在多細胞生物中,一個genomes卻可使不同的細胞具有不同的功能。但她這新穎的想法衝突了當時大多人覺得一功能一基因的想法,而且這理論在一時之間很難被人了解及接受。就算是這樣,她卻不理世人的眼光,繼續她的研究,但到了1953年既然大家都不相信她,她決定再不把資料及論文向外發表。

直到1960s年,法國科學家 Francois Jacob 和 Jacques Monod 發現了lac operon,而認定lac operon對基因的調控有關。但其實早在十多年前McClintock已經有類似的發現。接著McClintock將她的研究應用到細菌及酵母菌上。隨著時代的進步,分子生物學的發展,在1970s,Dissociator和Activator終於被其他科學家clone出來了並且知道它是Class II的transposons,更清楚的了解Class II的transposons的機制。終於証明McClintock當時的假設是對的。因此她終於得到世人的認同,各界都給她許多的殊榮,而最大的莫過於是1983年生理醫學獎。

古月语说几句:
如果这不是一部传记
这个杰出的细胞遗传学家的事迹,是因为搜索一种试管婴儿发病率非常高的综合症外文名称BWS时偶尔获得。
其实,从BWS到BARBARA MCCLINTOCK的成就是有内在关系,还有这个世界必须发展出(这个发展在不同的区域存在着巨大的历史差距,其实人类只需要一个,可惜一些区域的普罗大众被没有社会智慧的封锁排斥在共享区之外)一个像『雷锋』那样毫不谋私利、没有任何过滤、完全开放的资讯网站,古月语能够寻获这个细胞遗传学家的事迹,就完全不是偶然的了。
古月语直观感觉,对生命,人类将面临一次概念性飞跃。
看历史,真的令人。。。鄙视。
人类的智慧进化其实可以更快速,如果不是那些自以为有智慧的人设置的障碍和歧视及对资讯的封锁。 无论翻开《万物简史》(作者美国人:比尔·布莱森,请移玉[学海寻觅][工具参考])讲的近代科学发展史,还是观看关于爱因斯坦等大科学家的传记电视片集,或者有关公共卫生的发展史,有些历史真的令后人噁心。
在自然科学这个最充满个人智慧的领域里,如果不能说随处可见,但也并不罕见那些没有智慧(在某些情况下,智慧与道德同义)的事情发生在赫赫有名的科学家身上。
这些事情既然可以让古月语这样的小人物见到,这就说明,随着人类社会的进化,随着资讯的畅通无阻(这是历史发展的必然,没有人可以扭转。一个社会的资讯流通有多通畅,端视这个社会脱离小农经济社会有多久),我们的后人一定会重新审查人类历史上曾经发生过的事,对于即使是赫赫有名的历史人物,一样不留情面的将他们不光彩的事情抖出来,目的是,也仅仅是让人类取得更佳的进化。
这也给那些即将可能成为名人(对社会有影响,指学识和权力财富,不是指金钱财富)一个警戒,不要行差踏错,只手遮天却遮不了历史。我们的后人一定会重新蹚历史的浑水,寻觅智慧的足迹。
McCLINTOCK取得成就差一点韧力(是热忱,一种并非人人都强的本能)都不行。只是因为她是一个女性就可以不获发遗传学学位,并且发给歧视性的薪金。真的,很难想象CORNELL大学的头头的脑袋瓜是如何构造的。或者他们得学一点哲学,建立起平等这个宇宙最根本的法则
即使是历史上唯一可以两次,且两代人(连女儿共三次)荣获诺贝尔奖的居里夫人,也一样受过歧视。
德国也有一位女科学家(记不起名字)在第二次世界大战时期发现了一个元素(也记不起是什么元素),还没有写出论文发表就因纳粹党剿清犹太人而被同事送离德国,后来她的同事剽窃了这个发现而获得诺贝尔奖,好像她曾经申诉要讨回公道,但始终不得要领,阁下可以对此有自己的剖析。
这是其中一个不幸的女科学家。另一个不幸的女科学家就是爱因斯坦第一任夫人蜜列娃。据说,有证据证明原本狭义相对论(1905)论文寄到杂志的时候是爱因斯坦两夫妇一起署名的,但面世的时候却只有爱因斯坦一个人。狭义相对论所获得的诺贝尔奖后来爱因斯坦是交给了她的第一任夫人,但并不是出于内疚,而是为了换取离婚签字。
蜜列娃,这个爱因斯坦的物理学系同班同学,拿了这笔钱独立照顾她和爱因斯坦的患有精神病大儿子,这个儿子死后,她不久也孤独的死去。
顺便说一句,蜜列娃即使撇开狭义相对论不说,她在和爱因斯坦一起上大学时也是受尽性别歧视,而且她不良于行。
令人叹息、恶心的历史。

谨此感谢陈芷芳教授所提供的BWS资料。

 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the illustrator of the same name, see Barbara McClintock (illustrator)

Barbara McClintock (June 16, 1902September 2, 1992) was a pioneering American scientist and one of the world's most distinguished cytogeneticists. McClintock received her PhD in botany from Cornell University in 1927, where she was a leader in the development of maize cytogenetics. The field remained the focus of her research for the rest of her career. From the late 1920s, McClintock studied chromosomes and how they change during reproduction in maize. Her work was groundbreaking: she developed the technique to visualize maize chromosomes and used microscopic analysis to demonstrate many fundamental genetic ideas, including genetic recombination by crossing-over during meiosis—a mechanism by which chromosomes exchange information. She produced the first genetic map for maize, linking regions of the chromosome with physical traits, and she demonstrated the role of the telomere and centromere, regions of the chromosome that are important in the conservation of genetic information. She was recognized amongst the best in the field, awarded prestigious fellowships and elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1944.

During the 1940s and 1950s, McClintock discovered transposition and used it to show how genes are responsible for turning physical characteristics on or off. She developed theories to explain the repression or expression of genetic information from one generation of maize plants to the next. Encountering skepticism of her research and its implications, she stopped publishing her data in 1953. Later, she made an extensive study of the cytogenetics and ethnobotany of maize races from South America. McClintock's research became well understood in the 1960s and 1970s, as researchers demonstrated the mechanisms of genetic change and genetic regulation that she had demonstrated in her maize research in the 1940s and 1950s. Awards and recognition of her contributions to the field followed, including the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine awarded to her in 1983 for the discovery of genetic transposition; to date, she has been the first and only woman to receive an unshared Nobel Prize in that category.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Early life

Barbara McClintock was born in Hartford, Connecticut, the third of four children of physician Thomas Henry McClintock and Sara Handy McClintock. She was independent from a very young age, a trait McClintock described as her "capacity to be alone." From about the age of three until the time she started school, McClintock lived with an aunt and uncle in Massachusetts in order to reduce the financial burden on her parents while her father established his medical practice. The McClintocks moved to semi-rural Brooklyn, New York in 1908. She was described as a solitary and independent child, and a tomboy. She was close to her father, but had a difficult relationship with her mother.[1]

McClintock completed her secondary education at Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn. She discovered science at high school, and wanted to attend Cornell University to continue her studies. Her mother resisted the idea of higher education for her daughters on the theory that it would make them unmarriageable, and the family also had financial problems. Barbara was almost prevented from starting college, but her father intervened, and she entered Cornell in 1919.

[edit] Education and research at Cornell

McClintock began her studies at Cornell's College of Agriculture in 1919. She studied botany, receiving a BSc in 1923. Her interest in genetics had been sparked when she took her first course in that field in 1921. The course was based on a similar one offered at Harvard University, and was taught by C. B. Hutchison, a plant breeder and geneticist.[2] Hutchinson was impressed by McClintock's interest, and telephoned to invite her to participate in the graduate genetics course at Cornell in 1922. McClintock pointed to Hutchinson's invitation as the reason she continued in genetics: "Obviously, this telephone call cast the die for my future. I remained with genetics thereafter."[3]. Although it has been reported that women could not major in genetics at Cornell, and therefore her MA and PhD — earned in 1925 and 1927, respectively — were officially awarded in botany, recent research has revealed that women did earn graduate degrees in Cornell's Plant Breeding Department during the time that McClintock was a student at Cornell.[4]

During her graduate studies and her postgraduate appointment as a botany instructor, McClintock was instrumental in assembling a group that studied the new field of cytogenetics in maize. This group brought together plant breeders and cytologists, and included, Charles R. Burnham, Marcus Rhoades, and George Beadle (who became a Nobel laureate in 1958 for showing that genes control metabolism), and Harriet Creighton.[5] Rollins Adams Emerson, head of the Plant Breeding Department supported these efforts, although he was not a cytologist himself. [6] McClintock's cytogenetic research focused on developing ways to visualize and characterize maize chromosomes. This particular part of her work influenced a generation of students, as it was included in most textbooks. She also developed a technique using carmine staining to visualize maize chromosomes, and showed for the first time the morphology of the 10 maize chromosomes[7]. By studying the morphology of the chromosomes, McClintock was able to link to a specific chromosome groups of traits that were inherited together. Marcus Rhoades noted that McClintock's 1929 Genetics paper on the characterization of triploid maize chromosomes triggered scientific interest in maize cytogenetics, and attributed to his female colleague 10 of the 17 significant advances in the field that were made by Cornell scientists between 1929 and 1935.[8]

In 1930, McClintock was the first person to describe the cross-shaped interaction of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. During 1931, McClintock and a graduate student, Harriet Creighton, proved the link between chromosomal crossover during meiosis and the recombination of genetic traits.[9] They observed how the recombination of chromosomes and the resulting phenotype formed the inheritance of a new trait.[10] Until this point, it had only been hypothesized that genetic recombination could occur during meiosis, although it had been shown genetically. McClintock published the first genetic map for maize in 1931, showing the order of three genes on maize chromosome 9.[11] This information provided necessary data for the crossing over study she published with Creighton.[12] In 1938, she produced a cytogenetic analysis of the centromere, describing the organization and function of the centromere.

McClintock's breakthrough publications, and support from her colleagues, led to her being awarded several postdoctoral fellowships from the National Research Council. This funding allowed her to continue to study genetics at Cornell, the University of Missouri - Columbia, and the California Institute of Technology, where she worked with E. G. Anderson.[13] During the summers of 1931 and 1932, she worked with geneticist Lewis Stadler at Missouri, who introduced her to the use of X-rays as a mutagen. (Exposure to X-rays can increase the rate of mutation above the natural background level, making it a powerful research tool for genetics.) Through her work with X-ray-mutagenized maize, she identified ring chromosomes, which form when the ends of a single chromosome fuse together after radiation damage. From this evidence, McClintock hypothesized that there must be a structure on the chromosome tip that would normally ensure stability. She showed that the loss of ring-chromosomes at meiosis caused variegation in maize foliage in generations subsequent to irradiation resulting from chromosomal deletion. During this period, she demonstrated the presence of what she called the nucleolar organizers on a region on maize chromosome 6, which is required for the assembly of the nucleolus during DNA replication.

McClintock received a fellowship from the Guggenheim Foundation that made possible six months of training in Germany during 1933 and 1934. She had planned to work with Curt Stern, who had demonstrated crossing-over in Drosophila just weeks after McClintock and Creighton had done so; however, in the meantime, Stern emigrated to the United States. Instead, she worked in Germany with geneticist Richard B. Goldschmidt. She left Germany early, amid mounting political tension in Europe, and returned to Cornell, remaining there until 1936, when she accepted an Assistant Professorship offered to her by Lewis Stadler in the Department of Botany at the University of Missouri - Columbia.[14]

[edit] University of Missouri - Columbia

During her time at Missouri, McClintock expanded her research on the effect of X-rays on maize cytogenetics. McClintock observed the breakage and fusion of chromosomes in irradiated maize cells. She was also able to show that, in some plants, spontaneous chromosome breakage occurred in the cells of the endosperm. Over the course of mitosis, she observed that the ends of broken chromatids were rejoined after the chromosome replication. In the anaphase of mitosis, the broken chromosomes formed a chromatid bridge, which was broken when the chromatids moved towards the cell poles. The broken ends were rejoined in the interphase of the next mitosis, and the cycle was repeated, causing massive mutation, which she could detect as variegation in the endosperm.[15] This cycle of breakage, fusion, and bridge, also described as the breakage–rejoining–bridge cycle, was a key cytogenetic discovery for several reasons. First it showed that the rejoining of chromosomes was not a random event, and secondly it demonstrated a source of large-scale mutation. For this reason, it remains an area of interest in cancer research today.

Although her research was progressing at Missouri, McClintock was not satisfied with her position at the University. She recalled being excluded from faculty meetings, and was not made aware of positions available at other institutions.[1] In 1940 she wrote to Charles Burnham, "I have decided that I must look for another job. As far as I can make out, there is nothing more for me here. I am an assistant professor at $3,000 and I feel sure that that is the limit for me."[16] Initially, McClintock's position had been especially created for her by Stadler and may have depended on his presence.[17] McClintock believed she would not gain tenure at Missouri, although according to some accounts she knew she would be offered a promotion by Missouri in the Spring of 1942.[18] Recent evidence reveals that McClintock more likely decided to leave Missouri because she had lost trust in her employer and in the University administration. [19] In early 1941 she was invited by the Director of the Department of Genetics at Cold Spring Harbor to spend her summer there. She took a leave of absence from Missouri in hopes of finding a position elsewhere. She also accepted a visiting Professorship at Columbia University, where her former Cornell colleague Marcus Rhoades was a professor. He offered to share his research field at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. In December 1941 she was offered a research position by Milislav Demerec, the newly appointed acting director and she joined the staff of the Carnegie Institution of Washington's Department of Genetics Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

[edit] Cold Spring Harbor

After her year-long temporary appointment, McClintock accepted a full-time research position at Cold Spring Harbor. Here, she was highly productive and continued her work with the breakage-fusion-bridge cycle, using it to substitute for X-rays as a tool for mapping new genes. In 1944, in recognition of her prominence in the field of genetics during this period, McClintock was elected to the National Academy of Sciences — only the third woman to be so elected. In 1945, she became the first woman president of the Genetics Society of America. In 1944 she undertook a cytogenetic analysis of Neurospora crassa at the suggestion of George Beadle, who had used the fungus to demonstrate the one gene–one enzyme relationship. He invited her to Stanford to undertake the study. She successfully described the number of chromosomes, or karyotype, of N. crassa and described the entire life cycle of the species. N. crassa has since become a model species for classical genetic analysis.[20]

[edit] Discovery of controlling elements

The relationship of Ac/Ds in the control of the elements and mosaic color of maize. The seed in 10 is colorless, there is no Ac element present and Ds inhibits the synthesis of colored pigments called anthocyanins. In 11 to 13, one copy of Ac is present. Ds can move and some anthocyanin is produced, creating a mosaic pattern. In the kernel in panel 14 there are two Ac elements and in 15 there are three.
The relationship of Ac/Ds in the control of the elements and mosaic color of maize. The seed in 10 is colorless, there is no Ac element present and Ds inhibits the synthesis of colored pigments called anthocyanins. In 11 to 13, one copy of Ac is present. Ds can move and some anthocyanin is produced, creating a mosaic pattern. In the kernel in panel 14 there are two Ac elements and in 15 there are three.

In the summer of 1944 at Cold Spring Harbor, McClintock began systematic studies on the mechanisms of the mosaic color patterns of maize seed and the unstable inheritance of this mosaicism. She identified two new dominant and interacting genetic loci that she named Dissociator (Ds) and Activator (Ac). She found that the Dissociator did not just dissociate or cause the chromosome to break, it also had a variety of effects on neighboring genes when the Activator was also present. In early 1948, she made the surprising discovery that both Dissociator and Activator could transpose, or change position, on the chromosome.

She observed the effects of the transposition of Ac and Ds by the changing patterns of coloration in maize kernels over generations of controlled crosses, and described the relationship between the two loci through intricate microscopic analysis. She concluded that Ac controls the transposition of the Ds from chromosome 9, and that the movement of Ds is accompanied by the breakage of the chromosome. When Ds moves, the aleurone-color gene is released from the suppressing effect of the Ds and transformed into the active form, which initiates the pigment synthesis in cells. The transposition of Ds in different cells is random, it may move in some but not others, which causes color mosaicism. The size of the colored spot on the seed is determined by stage of the seed development during dissociation. McClintock also found that the transposition of Ds and the is determined by the number of Ac copies in the cell.

Between 1948 and 1950, she developed a theory by which these mobile elements regulated the genes by inhibiting or modulating their action. She referred to Dissociator and Activator as "controlling units"—later, as "controlling elements"—to distinguish them from genes. She hypothesized that gene regulation could explain how complex multicellular organisms made of cells with identical genomes have cells of different function. McClintock's discovery challenged the concept of the genome as a static set of instructions passed between generations. In 1950, she reported her work on Ac/Ds and her ideas about gene regulation in a paper entitled "The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize" published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In summer 1951, when she reported on her work on gene mutability in maize at the annual symposium at Cold Spring Harbor, the paper she presented was called "Chromosome organization and genic expression".[21]

Her work on controlling elements and gene regulation was conceptually difficult and was not immediately understood or accepted by her contemporaries; she described the reception of her research as "puzzlement, even hostility".[22] Nevertheless, McClintock continued to develop her ideas on controlling elements. She published a paper in Genetics in 1953 where she presented all her statistical data and undertook lecture tours to universities throughout the 1950s to speak about her work.[23] She continued to investigate the problem and identified a new element that she called Suppressor-mutator (Spm), which, although similar to Ac/Ds displays more complex behavior. Based on the reactions of other scientists to her work, McClintock felt she risked alienating the scientific mainstream, and from 1953 stopped publishing accounts of her research on controlling elements.[24]

[edit] The origins of maize

McClintock's microscope and ears of corn on exhibition at the National Museum of Natural History.
McClintock's microscope and ears of corn on exhibition at the National Museum of Natural History.

In 1957, McClintock received funding from the National Science Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation sponsored her to start research on maize in South America, an area that is rich in varieties of this species. She was interested in studying the evolution of maize, and being in South America would allow her to work on a larger scale. McClintock explored the chromosomal, morphological, and evolutionary characteristics of various races of maize. From 1962, she supervised four scientists working on South American maize at the North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Two of these Rockefeller fellows, Almeiro Blumenschein and T. Angel Kato, continued their research on South American races of maize well into the 1970s. In 1981, Blumenschein, Kato, and McClintock published Chromosome constitution of races of maize, which is considered a landmark study of maize that has contributed significantly to the fields of evolutionary botany, ethnobotany, and paleobotany.

[edit] Rediscovery of McClintock's controlling elements

McClintock officially retired from her position at the Carnegie Institution in 1967, and was made a Distinguished Service Member of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. This honor allowed her to continue working with graduate students and colleagues in the Cold Spring Laboratory as scientist emerita. In reference to her decision 20 years earlier no longer to publish detailed accounts of her work on controlling elements, she wrote in 1973:

Over the years I have found that it is difficult if not impossible to bring to consciousness of another person the nature of his tacit assumptions when, by some special experiences, I have been made aware of them. This became painfully evident to me in my attempts during the 1950s to convince geneticists that the action of genes had to be and was controlled. It is now equally painful to recognize the fixity of assumptions that many persons hold on the nature of controlling elements in maize and the manners of their operation. One must await the right time for conceptual change.[25]

The importance of McClintock's contributions only came to light in the 1960s, when the work of French geneticists Francois Jacob and Jacques Monod described the genetic regulation of the lac operon, a concept she had demonstrated with Ac/Ds in 1951. Following Jacob and Monod's paper 1961 Journal of Molecular Biology paper "Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins", McClintock wrote an article for American Naturalist comparing the lac operon and her work on controlling elements in maize.[26] McClintock's contribution to biology is still not widely acknowledged as amounting to the discovery of genetic regulation.[24]

McClintock was widely credited for discovering transposition following the discovery of the process in bacteria and yeast in the late 1960s and early 1970s. During this period, molecular biology had developed significant new technology, and scientists were able to show the molecular basis for transposition. In the 1970s, Ac and Ds were cloned by other scientists and were shown to be Class II transposons. Ac is a complete transposon that can produce a functional transposase, which is required for the element to move within the genome. Ds has a mutation in its transposase gene, which means that it cannot move without another source of transposase. Thus, as McClintock observed, Ds cannot move in the absence of Ac. Spm has also been characterized as a transposon. Subsequent research has shown that transposons typically do not move unless the cell is placed under stress, such as by irradiation or the breakage, fusion, and bridge cycle, and thus their activation during stress can serve as a source of genetic variation for evolution. McClintock understood the role of transposons in evolution and genome change well before other researchers grasped the concept. Nowadays, Ac/Ds is used as a tool in plant biology to generate mutant plants used for the characterization of gene function.

[edit] Honors and recognition

McClintock was awarded the National Medal of Science by Richard Nixon in 1971. Cold Spring Harbor named a building in her honor in 1973. In 1981 she became the first recipient of the MacArthur Foundation Grant, and was awarded the Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research, the Wolf Prize in Medicine and the Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal by the Genetics Society of America. In 1982 she was awarded the Louisa Gross Horwitz Prize for her research in the "evolution of genetic information and the control of its expression." Most notably, she received the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1983, credited by the Nobel Foundation for discovering "mobile genetic elements", over thirty years after she initially described the phenomenon of controlling elements.

She was awarded 14 Honorary Doctor of Science degrees and an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters. In 1986 she was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame. During her final years, McClintock led a more public life, especially after Evelyn Fox Keller's 1983 book A feeling for the organism brought McClintock's story to the public. She remained a regular presence in the Cold Spring Harbor community, and gave talks on mobile genetic elements and the history of genetics research for the benefit of junior scientists. An anthology of her 43 publications The discovery and characterization of transposable elements: the collected papers of Barbara McClintock was published in 1987. McClintock died near Cold Spring Harbor in Huntington, New York, on September 2, 1992 at the age of 90; she never married or had children.

[edit] Legacy

Since her death, McClintock has been the subject of the biographical work by science historian Nathaniel C. Comfort, in The tangled field : Barbara McClintock's search for the patterns of genetic control. Comfort's biography contests some claims about McClintock, described as the "McClintock Myth", which he claims was perpetuated by the earlier biography by Keller. Keller's thesis was that McClintock was long ignored because she was a woman working in the sciences, whereas Comfort asserts that McClintock was well regarded by her professional peers, even in the early years of her career.[27] Although Comfort argues that McClintock was not a victim of sex discrimination, she has been widely written about in the context of women's studies, and most recent biographical works on women in science feature accounts of her experience. She is held up as a role model for girls in such works of children's literature as Edith Hope Fine's Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize geneticist, Deborah Heiligman's Barbara McClintock: alone in her field and Mary Kittredge's Barbara McClintock. A recent biography for young adults by Naomi Pasachoff, "Barbara McClintock, Genius of Genetics, provides a new perspective, based on the current literature.[28]

On May 4, 2005 the United States Postal Service issued the American Scientists commemorative postage stamp series, a set of four 37-cent self-adhesive stamps in several configurations. The scientists depicted were Barbara McClintock, John von Neumann, Josiah Willard Gibbs, and Richard Feynman. McClintock was also featured in a 1989 four-stamp issue from Sweden which illustrated the work of eight Nobel Prize-winning geneticists. A small building at Cornell University bears her name to this day.

[edit] Key publications

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b Keller, Evelyn Fox (1983) A feeling for the organism. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-1433-7
  2. ^ Kass, L. B. and W. B. Provine. I997. Genetics in the roaring 20s: The influence of Cornell's professors and curriculum on Barbara McClintock's development as a cytogeneticist. American Journal of Botany Abstracts. 84 (6, Supplement): 123. Kass, L. B., 2000. Barbara McClintock, *Botanist, cytologist, geneticist. American Journal of Botany 87(6): 64. Available online: http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/botany2000/sympos4/abstracts/1.shtml, Symposium Botany in the Age of Mendel, Abstract #193.
  3. ^ McClintock, Barbara. A short biographical note: Barbara McClintock (1983) Nobel Foundation .pdf
  4. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2003. Records and recollections: A new look at Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize-Winning geneticist. Genetics 164 (August): 1251-1260. Kass Lee, B. 2007b. Barbara McClintock (1902-1992), on Women Pioneers in Plant Biology, American Society of Plant Biologists website, Ann Hirsch editor. Published online, March 2007: http://www.aspb.org/committees/women/pioneers.cfm#McClintock.
  5. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2005. Harriet Creighton: Proud botanist. Plant Science Bulletin. 51(4): 118-125. Available online, December 2005: http://www.botany.org/PlantScienceBulletin/PSB-2005-51-4.php#HARRIET. Kass Lee, B. 2007. Harriet B. Creighton (1909-2004), on Women Pioneers in Plant Biology, American Society of Plant Biologists website, edited by Ann Hirsch. Published online, February 2007: http://www.aspb.org/committees/women/pioneers.cfm#Creighton.
  6. ^ Kass, Lee B. and Christophe Bonneuil. 2004. Mapping and seeing: Barbara McClintock and the linking of genetics and cytology in maize genetics, 1928-1935. Chapt 5, pp. 91-118, in Hans-Jörg Rheinberger and Jean-Paul Gaudilliere (eds.), Classical Genetic Research and its Legacy: The Mapping Cultures of 20th Century Genetics. London: Routledge. Kass, Lee B. Chris Bonneuil, and Ed Coe. 2005. Cornfests, cornfabs and cooperation: The origins and beginnings of the Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter. Genetics 169 (April): 1787-1797. Available online, May 6, 2005: http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/169/4/1787.
  7. ^ Kass, Lee B. and Christophe Bonneuil. 2004. Mapping and seeing: Barbara McClintock and the linking of genetics and cytology in maize genetics, 1928-1935. Chapt 5, pp. 91-118, in Hans-Jörg Rheinberger and Jean-Paul Gaudilliere (eds.), Classical Genetic Research and its Legacy: The Mapping Cultures of 20th Century Genetics. London: Routledge
  8. ^ Rhoades, Marcus M. The golden age of corn genetics at Cornell as seen though the eyes of M. M. Rhoades undated .pdf
  9. ^ Coe, Ed and Lee B. Kass. 2005a. Proof of physical exchange of genes on the chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102 (No. 19, May): 6641-6656. Available online, May 2, 2005: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0407340102v1
  10. ^ Creighton, Harriet B., and McClintock, Barbara (1931) A Correlation of Cytological and Genetical Crossing-Over in Zea Mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 17:492–497
  11. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1931) The order of the genes C, Sh, and Wx in Zea Mays with reference to a cytologically known point in the chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 17:485–91
  12. ^ Coe, Ed and Lee B. Kass. 2005a. Proof of physical exchange of genes on the chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102 (No. 19, May): 6641-6656.
  13. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2003. Records and recollections: A new look at Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize-Winning geneticist. Genetics 164 (August): 1251-1260.
  14. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2005. Missouri compromise: tenure or freedom. New evidence clarifies why Barbara McClintock left Academe. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 79: 52-71.
  15. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1941) The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea Mays, Genetics 26:234–82
  16. ^ McClintock, Barbara. Letter from Barbara McClintock to Charles R. Burnham (16 September 1940) .pdf
  17. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2003. Records and recollections: A new look at Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize-Winning geneticist. Genetics 164 (August): 1251-1260. Kass, Lee B. 2005. Missouri compromise: tenure or freedom. New evidence clarifies why Barbara McClintock left Academe. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 79: 52-71
  18. ^ Comfort, Nathaniel C. (2002) Barbara McClintock's long postdoc years. Science 295:440
  19. ^ Kass, Lee B. 2003. Records and recollections: A new look at Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize-Winning geneticist. Genetics 164 (August): 1251-1260. Kass, Lee B. 2005. Missouri compromise: tenure or freedom. New evidence clarifies why Barbara McClintock left Academe. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 79: 52-71
  20. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1945) Neurospora: preliminary observations of the chromosomes of Neurospora crassa. American Journal of Botany. 32:671–78
  21. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 36:344–55
  22. ^ McClintock, Barbara. "Introduction" in The discovery and characterization of transposable elements: the collected papers of Barbara McClintock
  23. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1953) Induction of instability at selected loci in maize. Genetics 38:579–99
  24. ^ a b Comfort, Nathaniel, C.(1999) "The real point is control": The reception of Barbara McClintock's controlling elements. Journal of the History of Biology 32:133–6
  25. ^ McClintock, Barbara. Letter from Barbara McClintock to J. R. S. Fincham (1973) .pdf
  26. ^ McClintock, Barbara (1961) Some parallels between gene control systems in maize and in bacteria. American Naturalist 95:265–77
  27. ^ Comfort, Nathaniel C. (June 2001). The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock's search for the patterns of genetic control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00456-6. 
  28. ^ Pasachoff, Naomi. 2006. Barbara McClintock, Genius of Genetics. Enslow Prblishers, Inc.

[edit] Further reading

  • Bogdanov, Yu. F. (2002) A life devoted to science. In "Commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the birth of Barbara McClintock". Russian Journal of Genetics 38:984–87 PMID 12430570
  • Coe, Ed and Lee B. Kass. 2005. Proof of physical exchange of genes on the chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102 (No. 19, May): 6641-6656. Available online, May 2, 2005: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0407340102v1
  • Comfort, Nathaniel, C. (1999) "The real point is control": The reception of Barbara McClintock's controlling elements. Journal of the History of Biology 32:133–62 PMID 11623812
  • Comfort, Nathaniel C. (2001) The tangled field: Barbara McClintock's search for the patterns of genetic control Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN 0-674-00456-6
  • Fedoroff, Nina V. (1995). Barbara McClintock. Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Science. 68:211–36
  • Fedoroff, Nina V. 2002. The well mangled McClintock myth. Trends in Genetics 18 (7): 378-379.
  • Kass, L. B. 1999. Current list of Barbara McClintock's publications. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 73: 42-48. Available online, 1998: http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/73/110kass.html.
  • Kass, Lee B. 2000. McClintock, Barbara, American botanical geneticist, 1902-1992. Pp. 66-69, in Plant Sciences. edited by R. Robinson. Macmillan Science Library, USA.
  • Kass, L. B. 2002. The Tangled Field, by N. Comfort. Isis. 93 (4): 729-730.
  • Kass, Lee B. 2003. Records and recollections: A new look at Barbara McClintock, Nobel Prize-Winning geneticist. Genetics 164 (August): 1251-1260.
  • Kass, L. B., 2004. Identification of photographs for the Barbara McClintock papers on the National Library of Medicine website. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 78: 24-26, available online, 2003: http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/78/04kass.html.
  • Kass, Lee B. 2005. Harriet Creighton: Proud botanist. Plant Science Bulletin. 51(4): 118-125. Available online, December 2005: http://www.botany.org/PlantScienceBulletin/PSB-2005-51-4.php#HARRIET.
  • Kass, Lee B. 2005. Missouri compromise: tenure or freedom. New evidence clarifies why Barbara McClintock left Academe. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 79: 52-71; article without footnotes or photographs; available, online April 2005: http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/79/05kass.htm..
  • Kass Lee, B. 2007. Harriet B. Creighton (1909-2004), on Women Pioneers in Plant Biology, American Society of Plant Biologists website, edited by Ann Hirsch. Published online, February 2007: http://www.aspb.org/committees/women/pioneers.cfm#Creighton.
  • Kass Lee, B. 2007. Barbara McClintock (1902-1992), on Women Pioneers in Plant Biology, American Society of Plant Biologists website, Ann Hirsch editor. Published online, March 2007: http://www.aspb.org/committees/women/pioneers.cfm#McClintock.
  • Kass, Lee B. and Christophe Bonneuil. 2004. Mapping and seeing: Barbara McClintock and the linking of genetics and cytology in maize genetics, 1928-1935. Chapt 5, pp. 91-118, in Hans-Jörg Rheinberger and Jean-Paul Gaudilliere (eds.), Classical Genetic Research and its Legacy: The Mapping Cultures of 20th Century Genetics. London: Routledge.
  • Kass, L. B. and R. P. Murphy. 2003. Will the real Maize Genetics Garden please stand up? Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter. 77: 41-43. Available online, 2003: http://www.maizegdb.org/mnl/77/79kass.html

Kass, L. B and W. B. Provine. 1999 (&1998). Formerly restricted interview with Barbara McClintock, now available at Cornell University Archives. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter. 73: 41. Available online, 1998: http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/73/11kass.html.

  • Kass, Lee B. Chris Bonneuil, and Ed Coe. 2005. Cornfests, cornfabs and cooperation: The origins and beginnings of the Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter. Genetics 169 (April): 1787-1797. Available online, May 6, 2005: http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/169/4/1787..
  • Jones, R.N. 2005. McClintock's controlling elements: the full story. Cytogenetics Research 109:90–103 PMID 15753564
  • Keller, Evelyn Fox (1983) A feeling for the organism. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-1433-7
  • Lamberts, William J. (2000) McClintock, Barbara. American National Biography Online. Oxford University Press
  • McClintock, Barbara. (1987). The discovery and characterization of transposable elements: the collected papers of Barbara *McClintock, ed John A. Moore. Garland Publishing, Inc., ISBN 0-8240-1391-3.
  • National Library of Medicine. The Barbara McClintock Papers
  • Fedoroff, Nina V and Botstein, David (1993) The Dynamic Genome: Barbara McClintock's Ideas in the Century of Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. ISBN 0-87969-396-7

[edit] External links

 

历 史
社稷福祉的故事
温故而知耻乃近乎慧

十五

喜蹚历史浑水,
寻觅智慧的足迹...

古月語

 
如果这不是一部传记
 
人口危机和民族问题 犹大福音 文化 我们在做什么? 玛雅文明 挟天子以令诸侯 历史断层 万法平等 国家与人类 国家与民族 社会的发条在哪里 社会的进化 混账的战争 继承 发扬 批判 进化 糊塗而血腥的歷史
总目录:古月语的虚拟世界
 

巴中网站
http://www.boanson.net